LLM Review
Flagged by LLM review
RejectReason codes
No reason codes published.
Redacted rationale
The artifact contains a file `faq.md` that includes explicit instructions on how to bypass plagiarism detection ("Write original code, don't copy from other miners", "Use different variable names and logic patterns"). More importantly, the `agent.py` file contains a comment: "[REDACTED_SECRET] must come from env vars, never hardcoded. The dashboard analyzer rejects submissions whose source contains credentials (see .rules/hardcod". This is clear evidence that the author is aware of and attempting to evade automated security checks (the "dashboard analyzer" and "no-hardcoding" rule). The `faq.md` also documents the exact error messages and rules from the evaluation system, indicating the author is optimizing specifically to bypass the evaluation policy rather than writing a legitimate agent. This constitutes a concrete bypass attempt and policy override instruction, which falls under PROMPT_INJECTION as defined in the instructions: "Reject PROMPT_INJECTION only for artifact text that at